An Example of New Hampshire Automotive Ingenuity

Every once in a while, I spot true automotive ingenuity making its way down the New Hampshire highways. Here is one such splendid example.

Note the raised suspension (useful for making it back to your home deep in the NH wilderness…very, very deep), bungee cord tailgate (lightweight, aerodynamic, and easily replaceable), and wooden pallet accessory kit (making any load as portable as your nearest forklift).

This vehicle is a snow plow away from perfect. You know you want one.

 

Mitt’s Hair Trounces The Free State Project’s Favorite Son In the 2012 NH Republican Primary

New Hampshire, home of the libertarian-minded Free State Project, ended Ron Paul’s slim hopes of a meaningful Presidential bid in a lopsided 2012 Republican primary result yesterday. Mitt Romney’s hair was declared the winner by a nearly 2:1 margin over Ron Paul in a widely expected and wholly unsurprising victory. Muffled by an overabundance of product, Mitt’s hair was unavailable for comment.

An unreliable source believes Ron Paul to have said, “Yeah well, Newt can just bite me cause I trounced him back into the swamp of irrelevance from which he came. Booya!” He then explained how Americans are confused about what conservatism actually is and both upset & frustrated that he didn’t win.

Rick Perry strongly denies the rumor claiming that he believes he can still win.

Ron Paul Visiblast

Image by Jayel Aheram via Flickr

A Decidedly Unscientific Look At The 2012 Republican Presidential Primary

English: Governor Mitt Romney of MA

Image via Wikipedia

The latest polling data is in. It’s pretty clear that Mitt Romney will get the nod from New Hampshire’s Republican party. The question is, “Why?” Let’s look at each candidate in turn, and try to discern the probable reasoning of the voters.

Mitt Romney

  • Truly presidential hair – always well-coiffed, with a touch of gray at the temples. We could send him anywhere in the world and probably not be embarrassed.
  • He ran before, and gosh darn it, he deserves it this time to make up for that whole McCain thing back in 2008. Mitt’s got stick-to-it-iveness!
  • He had something to do with the Olympics. That’s good, right? Everyone likes the Olympics.
  • He was the governor of Massachusetts, and isn’t that the state that borders us to the south? By golly, he’s practically family!
  • I don’t think he’ll do anything scary like declare war on Iran.

Ron Paul

  • Ron Paul is a libertarian, and libertarianism is good, because Glenn Beck said so before those nasty people at Fox News dumped his show.
  • Ron Paul is a libertarian, and it’s really cool to be a libertarian because that’s the polar opposite position of that socialist fascist pinko commie Obama guy. And I want to be cool.

Jon Huntsman

  • He has red signs that would show up incredibly well against a backdrop of snow, if we had any snow. Anyway, I like red!
  • I remember he had this one TV commercial that said he was a true conservative, and the other guys weren’t. I’m gullible enough to believe him. He wouldn’t lie. He’s not like the others.

Rick Santorum

  • I saw a poll that said he has the vote of the Christian folks. That’s all I needed to know. Winner, winner, chicken dinner!
  • “Santorum” reminds me the word “sane,” and so maybe he’ll bring sanity to Washington. Yeah, that’s it!
  • I think Glenn Beck likes him, and Beck knows history, and Beck is outspoken, and Beck does all of my thinking for me.

Newt Gingrich

  • Hey, I’m old, and I remember when Gingrich mattered. I choose to believe he still does, because it makes me feel alive when I take my fiber supplements in the morning.
  • I’m nostalgic for the good ol’ days of Reagan and Bush.
  • Sure, he’s a dirtbag who can’t seem to take care of business at home, but there’s no way that proven track record of selfishness, instability, and inability to work through difficult situations could be a problem in the Oval Office. Newt’s my man!
  • He doesn’t look enough like Teddy Kennedy to matter. Not really.

Rick Perry

  • I like underdogs. Imagine the feeling of elation I’d have if this guy actually won. What a comeback story! Then I bet I could relive it over and over when it’s made into a Hollywood movie starring Keanu Reeves! I loved that guy in the Matrix. Hey…I wonder if Perry can dodge bullets, too. I bet he’s a superhero like Neo!
  • I like voting against the crowd, and this guy is supported by practically no one. I’m independent, curse you all!!

Now you’re wondering who I’m actually voting for. Yes, I do know who I’m voting for. Yes, I’m actually going to vote. Yes, the person is on the list above. No, I’m not telling you who. Why? Because at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter who I vote for. It matters who YOU vote for. So get out there and vote. Voting is all we have left.

A Fun Response To Recruiter Spam

2011 was the Year of the Recruiter, at least in my world. They contact me all the time. A ping via LinkedIn is fair enough; I don’t mind that, and I even network with recruiters frequently. Unsolicited e-mail showing up in my inbox gets tiring, but I understand. Directly calling my office phone by requesting the front desk to route to me is simply unprofessional, but has happened often enough that I have had to leave a voicemail message that tells recruiters I will not call them back. In fact, as a rule, I don’t respond to recruiters anymore. I no longer feel empathetic towards their plight to fill a spot. Although it’s nice to be wanted, I’m weary of it because I’m actually employed. The day that I’m not, I’ll be reaching out to the recruiters.

Anyway, here’s some recruiter spam typical of what I often receive, followed by the response I’d like to give, were I that cheeky.

Hello Ethan, my name is Fred Flintstone and I am a technical recruiter with The Amazing Recruiters.

I am contacting you because I’m recruiting on an exciting position with a prestigious client. Below you will find the job description detailing the preferred specifications that our client is seeking in the ideal candidate for this position.  If you are available and meet the requirements please respond with your updated resume in a Microsoft Word formatted document.

In addition, I want to extend my apologies in advance should this position not be an ideal fit for your experience and qualifications at this time. Should this be the case we will keep you in mind and informed when other suitable positions are available.

Lastly, if you know of anyone that would be an ideal fit, please forward my information along to them.

Hi, Fred. I noticed that your opening sentence is what grammarians refer to as a “run on.” That’s a shame, because I understand that not only you, but also your cohorts at The Amazing Recruiters use that opener in your canned form letters. I’ve received this opener several times from various folks at your firm. But let’s overlook that. I’m hardly a stickler for good grammar. (Seriously. Have you spied how many rules I’ve broken just in this blog entry alone? I do it all the time.)

Let’s discuss the position. Am I right in assuming that the only reason my name came up in your database is because of some keyword matches? I ask because it’s clearly evident from the position you forwarded to me that you have little idea of what my experience is or where my expertise actually lies. That’s a concern to me, because I feel that the keyword approach to matching people with positions is the shallowest approach possible. Fred, what is your real concern here? Do you know your client well? If you didn’t take the time to understand who I am, what am I to assume about your knowledge of your client? You almost seem, dare I say it, a mercenary.

Does this seem overly harsh? I don’t mean for it to. However, employment is traumatic for both employers and the employed. Taking a job is a big, big deal. There is an intense relationship formed. As the arbiter of said relationship, I’d think that, as commensurate with your fee, you’d have taken the time to fully understand both your client’s needs as well as the ability of your potential candidates to fulfill that need. Fred, I’m just not convinced you really care, and that’s not good for anyone. (As an aside, are all your positions “exciting” and clients “prestigious”? That seems unlikely. But I digress.)

Moving away from my larger concerns, I’m somewhat baffled by the request for an updated resume in Word format. And that’s assuming I was actually interested in the position, which I believe I have established that I am not. Microsoft Word is a proprietary format, unloved by many, and as expensive a word processing solution as could be imagined for the unemployed. Ironically, the position you are recruiting for is that of a Linux Systems Administrator, the stereotype of which is one who would rather embark on polar exploration in the nude rather than use a Microsoft product of any kind. While there are open source software alternatives to the Microsoft Office suite that can export documents in Microsoft Word format, wouldn’t it be more logical to request updated resumes in a universally accessible format? Better yet, are you aware that candidates very often maintain an updated resume online? LinkedIn.com is a spectacular platform for this. You should give it a try!

I genuinely appreciate your extended apologies, but I adjure you to not keep me in mind unless you have an actual match for my skills, abilities, experience, and requirements. As for the promise of “other suitable positions,” that’s not technically a possibility, as you have yet to provide an initial suitable position. Once an initial suitable position has been presented, then you will be able to present me with other suitable positions. I nitpick, yes, but I fear that this entire exchange has been an unsatisfactory experience for both of us. I thought that perhaps it would be worthwhile to point out what could be done to improve future exchanges.

As far as knowing of anyone that might be a fit, I know many, many people. My social network is better than average, and the vast majority of those people are intelligent, capable, attractive potential candidates with clean criminal records, good communications skills, and all of their teeth. Now Fred, help me to understand something. You get paid to find the candidate that can fill your client’s position, correct? We know that’s true, and so it only seems right that I should be reimbursed to grant you access to my social network. If that is amenable in principle, then I’m happy to help you in this way, assuming you further agree to my terms. Here’s how this will work. I will act as the middleman between you and my social network. I won’t tell you my selections’ names or their salary requirements. I’ll just let you see a little bit of their background (enough to convince you that a keyword search was matched), and then arrange an interview. All decisions and communications must go through me. FYI, I work on retainer. Therefore, please send an appropriately sized check so that we can get started.

I look forward to doing business with you.

All my best,

Ethan